Anti-intellectualism vs higher education

One of the first things any authoritarian regime tries to do is get higher education under its strict control. Usually this is done with some narrative about professors being elitist and subversive. And I certainly hope professors are subversive. Let me explain.

It is a professor’s job to subvert the equation of authority with Truth. A professor is tasked with getting students to think, to get evidence, to doubt, and if necessary to reject the party line. To get rid of “capital-T” Truth. If you think about it (pun intended) this is how all progress is made. Not by some strongman or beloved leader twirling their finger in the air and saying; “I alone can solve.”

In the Soviet Union, official Truth elevated a single party functionary, Trofim Lysenko, to the level of Truth in the understanding of genetics, and it hurt Soviet agriculture so badly that it fell behind Western agriculture.

In Nazi Germany, relativity was opposed as representing a “foreign spirit” and to be rejected as such. I suppose we should be grateful for whatever extent it delayed their creation of an atomic bomb, but they did pay a strategic price for that politicization.

China’s Cultural Revolution insisted that university professors go harvest grain. Their economy suffered and thousands starved.

Republicans have been loud in rejecting Michael Mann’s climate warnings as “politicized science”. We are just beginning to pay what will be a staggering cost for that denialism.

And now the new Secretary of Education , Betsy DeVoss, says college professors are indoctrinating students. Telling them what to think. A college professor (I have preserved their anonymity) responds:

The Trump administration has now just directly addressed me. Betsy DeVos, the current Secretary of Education, included in her speech at CPAC on Thursday:

“The fight against the education establishment extends to you too [college students]. The faculty, from adjunct professors to deans, tell you what to do, what to say, and more ominously, what to think. They say that if you voted for Donald Trump, you’re a threat to the university community. But the real threat is silencing the First Amendment rights of people with whom you disagree.”

Like most of what the Trump administration says, this is a ridiculous lie. Having taught for over 20 years now, the single political thing I have ever uttered in the classroom is to understand BOTH SIDES of the Affordable Care Act – to actually consider the other side’s argument for or against Obamacare (which Republicans are finally starting to realize).

The goal of every college professor is to get people to actually think rather than just accept what is said. Which might help shed light on why our president at one time proudly exclaimed that he “loves the poorly educated.” But I digress…

More importantly, the ridiculous statement by DeVos, like the cries of fake news by this incompetent group of liars, is a direct attempt to slander me and my colleagues. This administration has a short history, but already an unblemished and sustained record of hostility toward many groups of Americans (e.g., immigrants, women, minorities, LGBT, the press, etc.). They taunt and disparage our own people. I find it completely offensive and unacceptable. And now they add educators to the list of people to blame? Emphatically: No.

It’s just become personal.

Discuss this post on Facebook and Twitter

On photorealism, color, and dynamic range

(Putting this on my blog so I can find it again)

Here’s a great discussion of dynamic range, color profiles, color rendering and brightness, the purpose of that weird “false color” setting, and the generosity of one of imaging’s most advanced leaders.  I don’t do any rendering, but if you are involved in imaging at all, this is worth your time.

Don’t trust jump drives

Using a pencil tip to restore power flow to damaged jump drive
Jump drive CPR… with a pencil

“Is there any way to restore files from a jump drive?” asked the professor. He was very insistent, and a little panicked. His graduate assistant had stored ten hours of work on the drive, and now it wouldn’t read.

I plugged the jump drive into the USB extension cable that is always threaded through my monitor stand. There was no Windows sound, and the drive didn’t light up. The USB plug on the drive was slightly bent.  “It appears to be mechanically damaged,” I said. I took out my Swiss Army knife and folded out the can opener attachment. Swiss Army Knife with can opener attachment openIt’s a perfect little tool for prying open plastic cases.

The little circuit board appeared normal. On one side was a large memory chip, with no brand name. On the other side was a tiny quartz oscillator, a control chip, and an LED. The USB plug, like most jump drives, was soldered directly to the delicate circuit traces of the green board. This is where leverage on the plug most commonly damages the circuit.

I folded out a magnifying glass. At close range I could see a tiny crack in the lacquer surrounding the 5V lead of the USB plug. I plugged it into the extension again and propped it up on a plastic pen. Then, using the tip of a pencil, I pressed gently down on the trace inside the boundary of the crack. Instantly, the circuit lit up, and Windows announced the detection of a jump drive.

“Hold gently down on the pencil, and don’t move,” I said. Then, I began working the mouse and keyboard as quickly as I could.

Window+E brought up Windows file explorer. I clicked on the drive. Its contents appeared in the preview window.

Ctrl+A selected all. Ctrl+C copied all. I used the mouse to click on the C: drive, then the \Temp folder. Then Ctrl+V started the files copying. The Windows dialog box showed a progress bar as almost two GB of files were copied from the drive.

“Don’t move,” I said. The professor held still, keeping gentle pressure on the pencil for almost four minutes. Finally, the progress bar announced 100% files copied. Lucky professor, lucky grad student.

I motioned for the professor to lift the pencil. Instantly, Windows sounded the removal, and the drive circuit went dark for the last time.

Jump drives seem durable, but they’re not. Don’t rely on them. Use them for carrying copies of files. Don’t save work-in-progress on them. If you do, copy to a backed-up drive or cloud storage as soon as possible. Two locations is a lot better than one.



Paid protesters and other highly improbable things


It’s easy to laugh at the thought of significant numbers of “paid protesters”. After all, there are several practical hurdles to overcome.

  1. Start with the recruiting problem. How do you get the word out without anyone knowing? You can’t achieve newsworthy numbers with shadowy figures handing out bills in alleyways.
  2. How much do you pay them? Assume most of them need to park a car somewhere, and they won’t come for less than it costs to park. And buy dinner. And/or maybe stay in a hotel. In most urban areas that comes to about $200 minimum and your protesters would like to be compensated for their time. So… about $300 each?
  3. Now (using the women’s march as an example) multiply that figure times, say, twenty thousand per newsworthy location. A half-million in Washington. So, a hundred-fifty million bucks just in our nation’s capital, and just for that one march. George Soros is going to get tired of writing checks. Or he’ll need a very large staff to do it. Or to distribute a large amount of cash through a lot of intermediaries, all without anyone knowing.
  4. Of course, that money needs to be disbursed somehow. So you need an organization to make it flow. Of course, those quantities require bank reporting, and most people would have to declare it on their income taxes. H.R. Block tax people would know about it. It just doesn’t scale, let alone being able to hide it.

Tweet by Jennifer LiaoThere are many other problems of course. So when you ask a conservative friend if they believe that all those protesters are paid by somebody, they’ll say; “Of course not! Only a fool would believe that story.”

But here’s the problem: they’re supporting the guy who does believe it. Or at least, says it with a straight face, right after saying there were 3 million illegal voters, or that he won the EC in a landslide, or that he knows more about ISIS than the US intelligence. They’re looking at a guy who tells obvious whoppers, in charge of the world’s largest economy and nuclear arsenal, and… what? That doesn’t bother them? Is there nothing that would make them drop anchor and start checking their ethical maps?


  • Discuss this post On Facebook
  • The “outside agitators” and “paid protesters” dodge is as old as the hills anyway. It’s damn impractical to get a good protest going that way. Of course paid arson or violence, to discredit protesters, is much easier because only a tiny fraction of the number of people are involved.
  • Thousands of people bussed into New Hampshire to vote illegally and no one notices? Sure, why not.